The iONE platform, developed by G.T. GmbH (Berlin), is an autonomous, deployable, telemetry-equipped distributed energy node engineered to constitute the missing physical layer of the European energy-resilience infrastructure stack. The platform operates at the architectural and protocol layer where European energy sovereignty is structurally won, foregoing the cell-manufacturing layer that the preceding four years of European battery-infrastructure investment have demonstrated to be the wrong layer at which to deploy institutional climate-tech capital. The platform constitutes, in the formal European customs taxonomy and Combined Nomenclature framework operative in 2026, a category for which no dedicated tariff classification has yet been established — current customs treatment relies on component-level declaration under the existing electromechanical headings (HS 8507 for lithium-ion storage, 8541 for photovoltaic modules, 8504 for static converters, 8501 for tracking motors, 7610 for aluminium structures), with integrated declaration falling under HS 8543 70 90 (electrical apparatus “not specified or included elsewhere”). The taxonomic position is itself the formal regulatory evidence that the category iONE constitutes is category-creating rather than category-participant.
The European energy market in 2026 is a market in which the orchestration software has matured — gridX-into-E.ON, Octopus Kraken, 1KOMMA5°, Tibber, Next Kraftwerke — while the physical-asset layer beneath it has remained structurally inadequate to the operational envelope the market now requires. The EPEX SPOT wholesale market has transitioned to fifteen-minute clearing with documented standard deviation of thirty-three euros per megawatt-hour and over five hundred and seventy negative-price hours in 2024 alone. The Dunkelflaute event of 25 November 2025 cleared at three hundred and seventy-one euros per megawatt-hour on the day-ahead and reached approximately one thousand euros per megawatt-hour on the intraday peaks — the market measurement of the operational failure of the existing distributed-asset base under the European winter envelope. The Critical Entities Resilience Directive imposes autonomous-power capability on eleven sectors of designated critical entities; the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (ESRS E1) prohibits the diesel category from continuing to constitute the low-cost answer. The architectural gap is documented; the regulatory window is open.
The iONE platform addresses this gap through a three-layer architecture engineered for the operational requirements documented above. The physical layer is a structurally rigid, dual-axis-tracked, foundation-free deployable envelope with twenty-five-year design life and asymmetric thermal-and-mechanical engineering optimised for the European latitude profile. The internal control layer is iONEOS, the deterministic-and-probabilistic intelligence system through which the platform constitutes its data-architectural moat. The external orchestration layer is the European protocol surface — EEBus, Modbus TCP, OCPP, SG Ready — through which the deployed node participates in the European distributed-energy market under the operator's elected platform. The architectural choice is independence by design, compatibility by standard; the platform survives any one geopolitical configuration of the upstream cell supply chain through trilateral sourcing across Civil, Assured European, and emerging Gulf-and-Eastern-Mediterranean cell-manufacturing tracks.
The institutional investment case rests on four threshold passages. The Climate Performance Potential, measured under the World Fund impact-assessment methodology across diesel displacement, grid-stabilisation, and category attribution layers, passes the 100 megatonnes per annum threshold by a factor of 2.1 under the conservative case. The economic engine operates across three independent revenue layers — hardware margin at the two-times all-in mark-up, iONEOS recurring subscription across the operational life of the deployed unit, and grid-flexibility revenue at the grid-connected fraction of the fleet — under capital-light contract-manufacturing scaling on the existing European industrial base, foregoing the gigafactory-construction trajectory that has demonstrably failed in the European battery-manufacturing category. The risk architecture is engineered through four structural diversifications: multi-channel distribution via the GT Energy Family bank-ready framework across fourteen ProCredit Group jurisdictions, multi-segment commercial exposure across four independent end-markets, trilateral cell supply, and independent component validation as architectural answer to the certification-versus-reality gap that discredited conventional supply-chain governance across the preceding cycle. The founder commitment is documented at over EUR 374,000 in formally capitalised shareholder loans, with additional substantial operational expenses carried personally outside the formal loan account, and with the divestment of the founder's legacy industrial fuel-processing asset positioned to release further capital across the Series A horizon.
The platform extends to World Fund the formal request to lead the Series A round at EUR 2.5 million in total commitment, structured across three milestone tranches (EUR 800,000 at close for certification and Validation Programme launch; EUR 900,000 against documented first-tranche delivery for supply-chain governance and senior hires; EUR 800,000 against second-tranche operational metrics for series-ready scaling), complementary to the EUR 2.35 million EIC Accelerator application in evaluation, the EUR 1 million HTGF participation in process, and the IBB Berlin engagement in active conversation. The aggregate institutional capital structure delivers the platform to the post-Series A growth-round threshold under documented operational governance. The remaining nine chapters of this memorandum document, in operational detail, the substrate on which the request is constructed.
We ask. You decide.